New Directions for Theories for Why Employees Stay or Leave

Peter W. Hom, Kohyar Kiazad

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

We critically review classic and contemporary theory and research on employee turnover and retention and frame a future research agenda that generates new directions for these theories. We first review first- and second-generation turnover models that shaped conventional understanding of why employees voluntarily quit, classifying reasons as representing perceived desirability of movement or ease of movement. We next review the more contemporary unfolding model and its derivatives (i.e., shocks research, leader-departure effect, turnover event theory) that upended traditional explanations of how and why employees quit. After reviewing classic and contemporary turnover models, we shift our focus to job embeddedness, which over the past 20-plus years has taught us a great deal about why employees stay. We synthesize original job embeddedness research before appraising its extensions and recent developments. We conclude with a discussion of how organizations can cultivate the "right"kind of staying.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-213
Number of pages29
JournalAnnual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 21 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • employee turnover
  • job embeddedness
  • proximal withdrawal states
  • quiet quitting
  • retention
  • shocks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'New Directions for Theories for Why Employees Stay or Leave'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this