TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling the distribution of four vegetation alliances using generalized linear models and classification trees with spatial dependence
AU - Miller, Jennifer
AU - Franklin, Janet
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by United States Geological Survey (USGS) and Department of Defense (DoD) grants (to J. Franklin) and the Department of Geography, San Diego State University (support for J. Miller). We thank the following people for help and advice including comments on the manuscript: K. A. Thomas, T. Keeler-Wolf, P. Stine, D. Shaari, J. Michaelsen, S.J. Rey, M. F. Goodchild, J. Rogan, A. Hope, and D. Apalatea. We thank A. Guisan and A. Lehman for providing the opportunity to participate in the Advances in GLM/GAM workshop and the motivation to write this paper, and T. Edwards and the anonymous reviewers for improving the manuscript with their comments.
Funding Information:
The Mojave Desert, the smallest North American desert, covers 74,000 km 2 . Its location, between the Great Basin Desert to the north and the Sonoran Desert to the south, has resulted in its characterization as an ecotone, with both Great Basin and Sonoran vegetation, as well as its own endemic species ( Rowlands et al., 1982 ). The study area is a portion of the Mojave Desert Ecoregion within California, referred to as the Eastern California Subsection ( Fig. 1 ). The Mojave Vegetation Mapping Project (MVMP), sponsored by the Department of Defense (DoD) and carried out by the US Geological Survey (USGS), provided data and support for this project ( www.mojavedata.gov ).
Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2002/11/30
Y1 - 2002/11/30
N2 - Generalized linear models (GLMs) and classification trees were developed to predict the presence of four vegetation alliances in a section of the Mojave Desert in California. Generalized additive models were used to provide response shapes for parameterizing GLMs. Environmental variables used to model the distribution of the alliances included temperature, precipitation, elevation, elevation-derived terrain variables (slope, transformed aspect, topographic moisture index, solar radiation, and landscape position), and categorical landform/surface composition variables. Vegetation distributions exhibit spatial dependence and therefore we used indicator kriging to derive neighborhood values of "presence" also used as predictors in the models. The models were developed using 2859 observations coded present or absent for each of the four alliances, and assessed using 960 observations. In general, all of the models were improved with the addition of the kriged dependence term. However, models that relied heavily on the kriged dependence term were less generalizable for predictive purposes. Classification tree models had higher classification accuracy with the training data, but were less robust when used for predictions with the test data. Each of the models was used to generate a map of predictions for each alliance and the results were often quite different. The predicted maps with the kriged dependence terms looked unrealistically smooth, particularly in the classification tree models where they were often selected as the most important variables, and therefore heavily influenced the spatial pattern of the resulting map predictions.
AB - Generalized linear models (GLMs) and classification trees were developed to predict the presence of four vegetation alliances in a section of the Mojave Desert in California. Generalized additive models were used to provide response shapes for parameterizing GLMs. Environmental variables used to model the distribution of the alliances included temperature, precipitation, elevation, elevation-derived terrain variables (slope, transformed aspect, topographic moisture index, solar radiation, and landscape position), and categorical landform/surface composition variables. Vegetation distributions exhibit spatial dependence and therefore we used indicator kriging to derive neighborhood values of "presence" also used as predictors in the models. The models were developed using 2859 observations coded present or absent for each of the four alliances, and assessed using 960 observations. In general, all of the models were improved with the addition of the kriged dependence term. However, models that relied heavily on the kriged dependence term were less generalizable for predictive purposes. Classification tree models had higher classification accuracy with the training data, but were less robust when used for predictions with the test data. Each of the models was used to generate a map of predictions for each alliance and the results were often quite different. The predicted maps with the kriged dependence terms looked unrealistically smooth, particularly in the classification tree models where they were often selected as the most important variables, and therefore heavily influenced the spatial pattern of the resulting map predictions.
KW - Classification tree
KW - Generalized linear model
KW - Indicator kriging
KW - Mojave Desert
KW - Predictive vegetation modeling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037202441&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037202441&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00196-5
DO - 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00196-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0037202441
SN - 0304-3800
VL - 157
SP - 227
EP - 247
JO - Ecological Modelling
JF - Ecological Modelling
IS - 2-3
ER -