TY - JOUR
T1 - Mobility and Inequality in the Professoriate
T2 - How and Why First-Generation and Working-Class Backgrounds Matter
AU - Roscigno, Vincent J.
AU - Lee, Elizabeth M.
AU - Hurst, Allison L.
AU - Brady, David
AU - King, Colby R.
AU - Abraham Jack, Anthony
AU - Delaney, Kevin J.
AU - McDermott, Monica
AU - Muñoz, José
AU - Johnson, Wendi
AU - Francis, Robert D.
AU - Warnock, Debbie
AU - Weigers Vitullo, Margaret
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Social science research has long recognized the relevance of socioeconomic background for mobility and inequality. In this article we interrogate how and why working-class and first-generation backgrounds are especially meaningful and take as our case in point the professoriate and the discipline of sociology, – i.e., a field that intellectually prioritizes attention to group inequality and that arguably offers a conservative empirical test compared to other academic fields. Our analyses, which draw on unique survey items and open-ended qualitative materials from nearly 1,000 academic sociologists, reveal significant background divergences in academic job attainment, tied partly to educational background. Moreover, and especially unique and important, findings demonstrate significant consequences across several dimensions of inequality including compensation and economic precarity, professional visibility, and isolation at departmental, college or university, and professional levels. We conclude by highlighting how our discussion and results contribute in important ways to broader sociological concerns surrounding mobility, group disadvantage, and social closure.
AB - Social science research has long recognized the relevance of socioeconomic background for mobility and inequality. In this article we interrogate how and why working-class and first-generation backgrounds are especially meaningful and take as our case in point the professoriate and the discipline of sociology, – i.e., a field that intellectually prioritizes attention to group inequality and that arguably offers a conservative empirical test compared to other academic fields. Our analyses, which draw on unique survey items and open-ended qualitative materials from nearly 1,000 academic sociologists, reveal significant background divergences in academic job attainment, tied partly to educational background. Moreover, and especially unique and important, findings demonstrate significant consequences across several dimensions of inequality including compensation and economic precarity, professional visibility, and isolation at departmental, college or university, and professional levels. We conclude by highlighting how our discussion and results contribute in important ways to broader sociological concerns surrounding mobility, group disadvantage, and social closure.
KW - first generation
KW - inequality
KW - isolation
KW - mobility
KW - working class
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164566079&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85164566079&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/23780231231181859
DO - 10.1177/23780231231181859
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85164566079
SN - 2378-0231
VL - 9
JO - Socius
JF - Socius
ER -