Methodological implications of grouping Latino adolescents into one collective ethnic group

Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor, Mark A. Fine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

115 Scopus citations


This study examined the methodological appropriateness of categorizing Latinos as a homogenous population when assessing ethnic identity, self-esteem, emotional autonomy, and familial ethnic socialization. Reliability coefficients of Phinney's Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM), Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale (SES), Steinberg and Silverberg's Emotional Autonomy Measure, and Umaña-Taylor's Familial Ethnic Socialization Measure (FESM) were compared among Colombian, Guatemalan, Honduran, Mexican, Nicaraguan, Puerto Rican, and Salvadoran adolescents (N = 1,176) living in the United States. The measures demonstrated moderate to strong coefficients for certain Latino populations but considerably lower coefficients for other Latino groups. Furthermore, the concurrent validity of the MEIM and the FESM varied across Latino groups. Nationality, immigration history, and generational status are discussed as possible reasons for the divergent findings among groups. These findings call into question the grouping of Latino nationals into one homogenous population and have implications for researchers who study pan-ethnic populations (i.e., Latinos, Asians).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)347-362
Number of pages16
JournalHispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences
Issue number4
StatePublished - Nov 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Linguistics and Language


Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological implications of grouping Latino adolescents into one collective ethnic group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this