Land quality, land rights, and indigenous poverty

Bryan Leonard, Dominic P. Parker, Terry L. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations


Agricultural land endowments should contribute positively to economic growth, but in countries colonized by European powers this has not always happened. Productive land attracted colonization, which disrupted Indigenous institutions in ways that can stunt development. American Indian reservations provide a powerful example. Where land quality was high, the federal government facilitated land titling and non-Indian settlement through the General Allotment Act of 1887. The evidence suggests this process caused a U-shaped relationship between American Indian per capita income over 1970 to 2010 and a reservation's share of prime agricultural land, in contrast to a positive relationship across U.S. counties. The downward slope of the U is due to land ownership fractionation that disproportionately affected reservations with mid-quality land and now requires federal administration. After controlling for fractionation, the effect of prime land is positive, implying land quality has indirectly suppressed income growth through its effects on land rights.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number102435
JournalJournal of Development Economics
StatePublished - Mar 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Land quality, land rights, and indigenous poverty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this