JEEM and non-market valuation: 1974-1998

V. K. Smith

doi:10.1006/jeem.1999.1111

JEEM and non-market valuation: 1974-1998

V. K. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper considers whether the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) had impact on the development and applications of the methods used to estimate economic values for non-marketed environmental resources. Journal editors control the research dialogue in a discipline and as a result have the potential to influence its scope and direction. At least four areas of research have been influenced by JEEM, the theory and practice of contingent valuation, the use of preference restrictions in valuation, the development and application of corner solution models, and the role of substitution between environmental resources for valuation. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	351-374
Number of pages	24
Journal	Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Volume	39
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1999.1111
State	Published - 2000
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Editorial impact
Non-market valuation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Economics and Econometrics
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Access to Document

10.1006/jeem.1999.1111

Cite this

@article{d3b0643228e440339d57750c11008935,

title = "JEEM and non-market valuation: 1974-1998",

abstract = "This paper considers whether the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) had impact on the development and applications of the methods used to estimate economic values for non-marketed environmental resources. Journal editors control the research dialogue in a discipline and as a result have the potential to influence its scope and direction. At least four areas of research have been influenced by JEEM, the theory and practice of contingent valuation, the use of preference restrictions in valuation, the development and application of corner solution models, and the role of substitution between environmental resources for valuation. (C) 2000 Academic Press.",

keywords = "Editorial impact, Non-market valuation",

author = "Smith, {V. K.}",

note = "Funding Information: University Distinguished Professor, North Carolina State University, and Resources for the Future University Fellow. Partial support for this research was provided by the UNC Sea Grant program under grant R/MRD-32. Thanks are due to four anonymous referees for most constructive comments, Kelly DeMarchis for research assistance in developing citation records, and to Alice Bowser for preparing the paper.",

year = "2000",

doi = "10.1006/jeem.1999.1111",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "39",

pages = "351--374",

journal = "Journal of Environmental Economics and Management",

issn = "0095-0696",

publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - JEEM and non-market valuation

T2 - 1974-1998

AU - Smith, V. K.

N1 - Funding Information: University Distinguished Professor, North Carolina State University, and Resources for the Future University Fellow. Partial support for this research was provided by the UNC Sea Grant program under grant R/MRD-32. Thanks are due to four anonymous referees for most constructive comments, Kelly DeMarchis for research assistance in developing citation records, and to Alice Bowser for preparing the paper.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - This paper considers whether the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) had impact on the development and applications of the methods used to estimate economic values for non-marketed environmental resources. Journal editors control the research dialogue in a discipline and as a result have the potential to influence its scope and direction. At least four areas of research have been influenced by JEEM, the theory and practice of contingent valuation, the use of preference restrictions in valuation, the development and application of corner solution models, and the role of substitution between environmental resources for valuation. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

AB - This paper considers whether the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) had impact on the development and applications of the methods used to estimate economic values for non-marketed environmental resources. Journal editors control the research dialogue in a discipline and as a result have the potential to influence its scope and direction. At least four areas of research have been influenced by JEEM, the theory and practice of contingent valuation, the use of preference restrictions in valuation, the development and application of corner solution models, and the role of substitution between environmental resources for valuation. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

KW - Editorial impact

KW - Non-market valuation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034044844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034044844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jeem.1999.1111

DO - 10.1006/jeem.1999.1111

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034044844

SN - 0095-0696

VL - 39

SP - 351

EP - 374

JO - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

IS - 3

ER -

JEEM and non-market valuation: 1974-1998

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this