TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact tsunami-Eltanin
AU - Ward, Steven N.
AU - Asphaug, Erik
N1 - Funding Information:
SNW was supported by Southern California Earthquake Center Award 662703 and NSF Contract EAR-9804970. EIA was supported by the NASA Planetary Geology and Geophysics Program.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Employing classical tsunami theory and elementary assumptions about the initial shape of impact cavities, we compute tsunami from the Eltanin asteroid collision at 2.15 Ma. An Eltanin impactor 4 km in diameter would have blown an initial cavity as deep as the ocean and 60 km wide into the South Pacific and delivered a 200-300 m high tsunami to the Antarctic Peninsula and the southern tip of South America 1200-1500 km away. New Zealand, 6000 km distant, would have met 60 m waves. Generalizing these results to other size impactors, we fit simplified tsunami attenuation laws to maximum tsunami heights extracted from the full-wave calculations. If Eltanin was 1 km in diameter instead of 4 km, its waves would have been at least five times smaller. An asteroid the size of Chicxulub (10 km diameter), had it fallen into water deeper than 1000 m, would have sent a 100 m tsunami out to 4000 km distance, even if shoaling amplifications are neglected.
AB - Employing classical tsunami theory and elementary assumptions about the initial shape of impact cavities, we compute tsunami from the Eltanin asteroid collision at 2.15 Ma. An Eltanin impactor 4 km in diameter would have blown an initial cavity as deep as the ocean and 60 km wide into the South Pacific and delivered a 200-300 m high tsunami to the Antarctic Peninsula and the southern tip of South America 1200-1500 km away. New Zealand, 6000 km distant, would have met 60 m waves. Generalizing these results to other size impactors, we fit simplified tsunami attenuation laws to maximum tsunami heights extracted from the full-wave calculations. If Eltanin was 1 km in diameter instead of 4 km, its waves would have been at least five times smaller. An asteroid the size of Chicxulub (10 km diameter), had it fallen into water deeper than 1000 m, would have sent a 100 m tsunami out to 4000 km distance, even if shoaling amplifications are neglected.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036219013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036219013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00147-3
DO - 10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00147-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0036219013
SN - 0967-0645
VL - 49
SP - 1073
EP - 1079
JO - Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography
JF - Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography
IS - 6
ER -