TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact evolution of asteroid shapes 1. Random mass redistribution
AU - Korycansky, D. G.
AU - Asphaug, Erik
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are members of the Center for Origin, Dynamics and Evolution of Planets (CODEP) at UC Santa Cruz. CODEP is a branch of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP) of the University of California. The work in this paper was supported by NASA Grants NAG5-11521-001, “Post-Impact Asteroids: Gravitational Interactions, Spin States, and Shapes,” and NAG5-8914-002, “Small Bodies and Planetary Collisions.” We thank the referees, D. Richardson and E. Ryan, for comments that have improved the presentation of the results of this paper.
PY - 2003/6/1
Y1 - 2003/6/1
N2 - We explore whether the cumulative effect of small-scale meteoroid bombardment can drive asteroids into nonaxisymmetric shapes comparable to those of known objects (elongated prolate forms, twin-lobed binaries, etc). We simulate impact cratering as an excavation followed by the launch, orbit, and reimpact of ejecta. Orbits are determined by the gravity and rotation of the evolving asteroid, whose shape and spin change as cratering occurs repeatedly. For simplicity we consider an end-member evolution where impactors are all much smaller than the asteroid and where all ejecta remain bound. Given those assumptions, we find that cumulative small impacts on rotating asteroids lead to oblate shapes, irrespective of the chosen value for angle of repose or for initial angular momentum. The more rapidly a body is spinning, the more flattened the outcome, but oblateness prevails. Most actual asteroids, by contrast, appear spherical to prolate. We also evaluate the timescale for reshaping by small impacts and compare it to the timescale for catastrophic disruption. For all but the steepest size distributions of impactors, reshaping from small impacts takes more than an order of magnitude longer than catastrophic disruption. We conclude that small-scale cratering is probably not dominant in shaping asteroids, unless our assumptions are naive. We believe we have ruled out the end-member scenario; future modeling shall include angular momentum evolution from impacts, mass loss in the strength regime, and craters with diameters up to the disruption threshold. The ultimate goal is to find out how asteroids get their shapes and spins and whether tidal encounters in fact play a dominant role.
AB - We explore whether the cumulative effect of small-scale meteoroid bombardment can drive asteroids into nonaxisymmetric shapes comparable to those of known objects (elongated prolate forms, twin-lobed binaries, etc). We simulate impact cratering as an excavation followed by the launch, orbit, and reimpact of ejecta. Orbits are determined by the gravity and rotation of the evolving asteroid, whose shape and spin change as cratering occurs repeatedly. For simplicity we consider an end-member evolution where impactors are all much smaller than the asteroid and where all ejecta remain bound. Given those assumptions, we find that cumulative small impacts on rotating asteroids lead to oblate shapes, irrespective of the chosen value for angle of repose or for initial angular momentum. The more rapidly a body is spinning, the more flattened the outcome, but oblateness prevails. Most actual asteroids, by contrast, appear spherical to prolate. We also evaluate the timescale for reshaping by small impacts and compare it to the timescale for catastrophic disruption. For all but the steepest size distributions of impactors, reshaping from small impacts takes more than an order of magnitude longer than catastrophic disruption. We conclude that small-scale cratering is probably not dominant in shaping asteroids, unless our assumptions are naive. We believe we have ruled out the end-member scenario; future modeling shall include angular momentum evolution from impacts, mass loss in the strength regime, and craters with diameters up to the disruption threshold. The ultimate goal is to find out how asteroids get their shapes and spins and whether tidal encounters in fact play a dominant role.
KW - Asteroids
KW - Dynamics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038442161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038442161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00079-4
DO - 10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00079-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0038442161
SN - 0019-1035
VL - 163
SP - 374
EP - 388
JO - Icarus
JF - Icarus
IS - 2
ER -