TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying barriers to the effective use of clinical reminders
T2 - Bootstrapping multiple methods
AU - Patterson, Emily S.
AU - Doebbeling, Bradley N.
AU - Fung, Constance H.
AU - Militello, Laura
AU - Anders, Shilo
AU - Asch, Steven M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We appreciate the contributions of Drs. Toni Tripp-Reimer, Ashley Hadeen, Robert Smith, Bonnie BootsMiller, and Valerie Forman-Hoffman to the design of the survey instrument, Juliet Woods and Toni Tripp-Reimer for support in analysis of the survey data, and Peter Glassman and Jason Saleem for their insights regarding the effective design and use of clinical reminders. This research was supported by the Department of Veteran’s Affairs, Veteran’s Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service (TRX 02-216, CPI99-126, and CP101-141, and Management Consultation Project). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the view of the Department of Veterans Affairs. A VA HSR&D Advanced Career Development Award supported Dr. Asch and a VA HSR&DMerit Review Entry Program Award supported Dr. Patterson.
PY - 2005/6
Y1 - 2005/6
N2 - Advances in electronic medical record capabilities enable clinical reminders to inform providers when recommended actions are "due" for a patient. Despite evidence that they improve adherence to guidelines, the Veteran's Health Administration (VHA) has experienced challenges in having providers consistently use clinical reminders as intended. In this paper, we describe how multiple methods were used to opportunistically triangulate, or "bootstrap," an understanding of barriers to the effective use of clinical reminders in the VHA. In an initial study using ethnographic observations and semi-structured interviews of HIV clinical reminders, we identified six barriers to effective use: workload, time to remove inapplicable reminders, false alarms, training, reduced eye contact, and the use of paper forms rather than software. In a second study, we collected open-ended and closed-ended data regarding barriers and facilitators to the use of clinical reminders in general in the VHA through a survey of 261 participants at a national informatics meeting, where 104 of 142 VHA health care facilities were represented. The findings from the second study extended our understanding of the previously identified barriers. In addition, four new barriers were identified: ease of use issues, accessibility of workstations, resident physicians and trainees, and administration benefiting more than providers from clinical reminder use. We discuss potential implications regarding the similarities and differences in study findings for factors to consider in planning interventions to improve clinical reminder use.
AB - Advances in electronic medical record capabilities enable clinical reminders to inform providers when recommended actions are "due" for a patient. Despite evidence that they improve adherence to guidelines, the Veteran's Health Administration (VHA) has experienced challenges in having providers consistently use clinical reminders as intended. In this paper, we describe how multiple methods were used to opportunistically triangulate, or "bootstrap," an understanding of barriers to the effective use of clinical reminders in the VHA. In an initial study using ethnographic observations and semi-structured interviews of HIV clinical reminders, we identified six barriers to effective use: workload, time to remove inapplicable reminders, false alarms, training, reduced eye contact, and the use of paper forms rather than software. In a second study, we collected open-ended and closed-ended data regarding barriers and facilitators to the use of clinical reminders in general in the VHA through a survey of 261 participants at a national informatics meeting, where 104 of 142 VHA health care facilities were represented. The findings from the second study extended our understanding of the previously identified barriers. In addition, four new barriers were identified: ease of use issues, accessibility of workstations, resident physicians and trainees, and administration benefiting more than providers from clinical reminder use. We discuss potential implications regarding the similarities and differences in study findings for factors to consider in planning interventions to improve clinical reminder use.
KW - Clinical reminder
KW - Computerized provider order entry
KW - Electronic medical record
KW - Evidence based medicine
KW - Human factors
KW - Patient safety
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19444363293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19444363293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.015
DO - 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 15896692
AN - SCOPUS:19444363293
SN - 1532-0464
VL - 38
SP - 189
EP - 199
JO - Journal of Biomedical Informatics
JF - Journal of Biomedical Informatics
IS - 3
ER -