TY - JOUR
T1 - Guidelines for organizing a fisheries learning exchange
AU - Thompson, Katie R.
AU - Weaver, Amy Hudson
AU - Jenkins, Lekelia Danielle
AU - Zenny, Nathalie
AU - Pilcher, Nicolas J.
AU - Peckham, S. Hoyt
AU - Heyman, William D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) for its financial and logistical support of the beginning phases of this research, as well as the University of Washington and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (Grant # BR2013-048) for their continued financial support. The authors would also like to thank the workshop participants for their time and valuable contributions: Dennis Abrahams, Fernando Bretos, Noe Bustamante Flores, Nancy Daves, Wes Erikson, Will Heyman, Amy Hudson Weaver, Noah Idechong, Mitchell Lay, Jesus Lucero, William Maheia, Shawn Peabody, Nicolas Pilcher, Joseph Quinata, Cathlyn Stylinski, Steven Victor, Johnny Wong Sin Fatt, and Nathalie Zenny. Finally, the authors thank the anonymous reviewers for giving their time and advice to improve the paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - This short communication piece presents guidelines and challenges for organizing fisheries learning exchanges (FLEs). Non-governmental organizations, government agencies, and resource users use FLEs to share best practices and bridge knowledge gaps between small-scale fishing communities and stakeholder groups. Even though FLEs are widely used and have numerous cited benefits, there are challenges associated with planning and implementing FLEs. To overcome these challenges and maximize FLEs’ effectiveness, the authors describe guidelines for FLE organizers. The guidelines are based on the perspectives of over 20 FLE experts collected during 2013 through questionnaires, interviews, discussions, and surveys. The guidelines include steps that organizers should take before, during, and after a FLE. For instance, there was broad consensus that before a FLE, it is important to select a diverse group of participants, including both conservation advocates and critics, and to create an exchange agreement outlining the roles and responsibilities of participants. During a FLE, cultural activities and daily reflections by participants are valuable to the exchange process. After a FLE, activities that formalize the participants’ involvement in the FLE are important, such as welcome-home ceremonies and participation certificates. Follow-up support for FLE participants is perceived as an essential step in the FLE and should be included in the FLE's budget. Finally, challenges in organizing FLEs are explicitly described and potential solutions to overcome those challenges are provided. The authors researched and compiled these guidelines and challenges to inform and improve the increasingly widespread use of FLEs.
AB - This short communication piece presents guidelines and challenges for organizing fisheries learning exchanges (FLEs). Non-governmental organizations, government agencies, and resource users use FLEs to share best practices and bridge knowledge gaps between small-scale fishing communities and stakeholder groups. Even though FLEs are widely used and have numerous cited benefits, there are challenges associated with planning and implementing FLEs. To overcome these challenges and maximize FLEs’ effectiveness, the authors describe guidelines for FLE organizers. The guidelines are based on the perspectives of over 20 FLE experts collected during 2013 through questionnaires, interviews, discussions, and surveys. The guidelines include steps that organizers should take before, during, and after a FLE. For instance, there was broad consensus that before a FLE, it is important to select a diverse group of participants, including both conservation advocates and critics, and to create an exchange agreement outlining the roles and responsibilities of participants. During a FLE, cultural activities and daily reflections by participants are valuable to the exchange process. After a FLE, activities that formalize the participants’ involvement in the FLE are important, such as welcome-home ceremonies and participation certificates. Follow-up support for FLE participants is perceived as an essential step in the FLE and should be included in the FLE's budget. Finally, challenges in organizing FLEs are explicitly described and potential solutions to overcome those challenges are provided. The authors researched and compiled these guidelines and challenges to inform and improve the increasingly widespread use of FLEs.
KW - Fisheries learning exchange
KW - Fisheries management
KW - Knowledge exchange
KW - Marine conservation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008368532&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008368532&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.008
DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85008368532
SN - 0308-597X
VL - 77
SP - 214
EP - 218
JO - Marine Policy
JF - Marine Policy
ER -