Abstract
The mutiny that took place in Singapore in February 1915 is usually dismissed as a footnote in the history of empire. One reason why it is marginalized is because the mutiny does not conform to a politics that seeks the formation of an independent territorial nation-state as its inevitable conclusion. This article returns to that initial moment of insurgency to argue that the mutiny offers a unique window into the political imaginaries of British Indian soldiers, seen as military migrant workers. A close reading of soldiers’ letters against the Rowlatt Committee's Sedition Report suggests a politics of equality and emancipation uncontaminated by the desire for national liberation. Two kinds of insurgency thus become visible: international space as an unsettled zone of attraction and desire and a nascent political subjectivity that rejects the disciplines of imperial military labor. The primary causes of these transformations, I argue, are the insurgent effects of long-distance travel.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 913-927 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Globalizations |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- British Indian Army
- Singapore Mutiny 1915
- international space
- long-distance travel
- soldiers’ letters
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law