TY - JOUR
T1 - Formalizing chapter 9’s experts
AU - Coordes, Laura N.
N1 - Funding Information:
235. About the Program, U.S. Dept. of Just. (May 12, 2016), https://www.justice.gov/ust/ about-program [https://perma.cc/PEV4-UDHV] (“[T]he program is funded by the United States Trustee System Fund, which consists primarily of fees paid by parties and businesses invoking Federal bankruptcy protection.”). 236. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 327, 328 (2012).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Michigan Law Review Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Chapter 9 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code has many shortcomings. One of the most persistent, yet understudied, problems judges face in chapter 9 is also a problem that exists in other areas of bankruptcy law: the sheer difficulty of applying generalized plan confirmation standards to wildly different, highly specialized entities. In practice, judges have turned to experts—individuals well versed in municipal finance, mediation, and the particular debtor community— to help overcome this problem in chapter 9. These experts often perform critical roles in a municipal bankruptcy case, including conducting mediations, investigating the municipality’s finances, and even helping to craft the municipality’s plan of debt adjustment. Despite the important roles experts play in bankruptcy, their appointment and selection process receives little attention, and the scope of their role is often ill defined. This Article highlights the concerns that arise due to the lack of procedures surrounding experts in municipal bankruptcy. After exploring the benefits and pitfalls associated with using experts in chapter 9 and elsewhere, this Article provides detailed guidance for designing formal procedures for selecting, appointing, and using experts in chapter 9.
AB - Chapter 9 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code has many shortcomings. One of the most persistent, yet understudied, problems judges face in chapter 9 is also a problem that exists in other areas of bankruptcy law: the sheer difficulty of applying generalized plan confirmation standards to wildly different, highly specialized entities. In practice, judges have turned to experts—individuals well versed in municipal finance, mediation, and the particular debtor community— to help overcome this problem in chapter 9. These experts often perform critical roles in a municipal bankruptcy case, including conducting mediations, investigating the municipality’s finances, and even helping to craft the municipality’s plan of debt adjustment. Despite the important roles experts play in bankruptcy, their appointment and selection process receives little attention, and the scope of their role is often ill defined. This Article highlights the concerns that arise due to the lack of procedures surrounding experts in municipal bankruptcy. After exploring the benefits and pitfalls associated with using experts in chapter 9 and elsewhere, this Article provides detailed guidance for designing formal procedures for selecting, appointing, and using experts in chapter 9.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046161037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046161037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046161037
SN - 0026-2234
VL - 116
SP - 1249
EP - 1295
JO - Michigan law review
JF - Michigan law review
IS - 7
ER -