Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Failure analysis of module design qualification testing - III: 1997-2005 vs. 2005-2007 vs. 2007-2009

  • G. TamizhMani
  • , B. Li
  • , T. Arends
  • , J. Kuitche
  • , B. Raghuraman
  • , W. Shisler
  • , K. Farnsworth
  • , A. Voropayev
  • , D. Parker

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

Qualification testing of photovoltaic modules is a set of well-defined accelerated stress tests with strict pass/fail criteria based on functionality / performance, safety / insulation and visual requirements. This paper, third in series from the Photovoltaic Testing Laboratory of ASU / TUV Rheinland PTL, compares the overall failure rates obtained in three consecutive periods: 1997-2005, 2005- 2007 and 2007-2009. This paper also presents a distribution of failures, for the 2007-2009 period, among the four pass criteria defined in the standard: Visual failure (for example, extensive delamination), dry insulation failure (safety issue), wet resistance failure (safety issue) and performance failure (power drop).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProgram - 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, PVSC 2010
Pages251-255
Number of pages5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes
Event35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, PVSC 2010 - Honolulu, HI, United States
Duration: Jun 20 2010 → Jun 25 2010

Publication series

NameConference Record of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference
ISSN (Print)0160-8371

Other

Other35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, PVSC 2010
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityHonolulu, HI
Period6/20/10 → 6/25/10

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Failure analysis of module design qualification testing - III: 1997-2005 vs. 2005-2007 vs. 2007-2009'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this