Abstract
The relative goodness of fit of four competing factor models of the Counselor Rating Form-Short was examined across client (N = 191) and nonclient (N = 111) samples by confirmatory factor analysis. The four models tested were (a) the single, general, positive-evaluation factor; (b) the three orthogonal factors (expertness, trustworthiness, and attractiveness); (c) the three oblique factors; and (d) a two-step hierarchical-factor model consisting of the three independent first-order factors and an independent second-order general factor. Results of the confirmatory factor analyses supported the validity of the two-step hierarchical-factor model for both the client and nonclient samples. The factor structure of this two-step hierarchical-factor model was found to be invariant across the two samples.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 330-335 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of counseling psychology |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 1 1988 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Factor Structure of the Counselor Rating Form-Short'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS