TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the use of futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking among engineering education research collaborators
AU - Dalal, Medha
AU - Carberry, Adam
AU - Archambault, Leanna
N1 - Funding Information:
Investigating ways of thinking within engineering education has become a point of interest. The quotation from Dr. Douglas, former National Science Foundation (NSF) program officer within the Division of Engineering Education and Centers, exemplifies the importance of ways of thinking and cross‐collaborations in engineering education research (EER). It is believed that adopting new ways of thinking can address chronic issues in the system, promote diversity and inclusion in the profession, and lead to the exploration of engineering epistemologies within social contexts (Donofrio & Whitefoot, 2015 ; , 2006 ; National Science Foundation, 2017 ). A ways of thinking lens could encompass all conscious activities to design interventions, develop models, innovate processes, and garner a deeper understanding of the underlying cultures to challenge perceptions and move toward creative solutions to complex problems of practice. The challenge is that within actual practices, ways of thinking are often taken for granted or partly ignored despite their influence on innovation (Johansson‐Sköldberg et al., 2013 ; Schön, 1992 ). Researchers might be unknowingly and implicitly using one or more ways of thinking thereby overlooking the influence of ways of thinking on how engineering education projects are conceived and executed. Journal of Engineering Education
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Engineering Education published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Engineering Education.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Background: Multiple reports call for new ways of thinking to address challenges facing engineering education in the coming decades. Adopting these approaches first requires identifying and understanding existing ways of thinking among those engaging in engineering education research. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study is motivated by the recently published Framework for Applying Ways of Thinking in Engineering Education Research (FAWTEER). The purpose is to determine if and how the four ways of thinking proposed under FAWTEER—futures, values, systems, and strategic—are practiced by engineering education research collaborators. Design/Method: Seven engineer-social scientist collaborator pairs across heterogeneous research projects were interviewed in dyads. Data were analyzed using an inductive coding approach that was informed by the framework and literature. Results: Emergent findings provided evidence of collaborators' use of futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking, but the interpretations and relevance of a particular way of thinking varied depending on the project context. Proposal calls, organizational structures and policies, intentionality, and culture were identified as determinants that could foster or hinder the implementation of different ways of thinking. Conclusions: Ways of thinking may be taken for granted or partly ignored in research practices despite their potential influence on innovation. This study highlights how futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking are enacted in engineering education research and suggests the need to further explore connections between ways of thinking and cultures that exist at the departmental, institutional, and disciplinary levels.
AB - Background: Multiple reports call for new ways of thinking to address challenges facing engineering education in the coming decades. Adopting these approaches first requires identifying and understanding existing ways of thinking among those engaging in engineering education research. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study is motivated by the recently published Framework for Applying Ways of Thinking in Engineering Education Research (FAWTEER). The purpose is to determine if and how the four ways of thinking proposed under FAWTEER—futures, values, systems, and strategic—are practiced by engineering education research collaborators. Design/Method: Seven engineer-social scientist collaborator pairs across heterogeneous research projects were interviewed in dyads. Data were analyzed using an inductive coding approach that was informed by the framework and literature. Results: Emergent findings provided evidence of collaborators' use of futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking, but the interpretations and relevance of a particular way of thinking varied depending on the project context. Proposal calls, organizational structures and policies, intentionality, and culture were identified as determinants that could foster or hinder the implementation of different ways of thinking. Conclusions: Ways of thinking may be taken for granted or partly ignored in research practices despite their potential influence on innovation. This study highlights how futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking are enacted in engineering education research and suggests the need to further explore connections between ways of thinking and cultures that exist at the departmental, institutional, and disciplinary levels.
KW - collaborative research
KW - culture
KW - ways of thinking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150935458&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85150935458&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jee.20511
DO - 10.1002/jee.20511
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85150935458
SN - 1069-4730
VL - 112
SP - 382
EP - 402
JO - Journal of Engineering Education
JF - Journal of Engineering Education
IS - 2
ER -