Abstract
Videos have become a popular way to engage students with material prior to a class, yet this is an unexplored area of research. There is support for the use of videos where instructors tutor students, but few studies have been conducted in a classroom. In this study, we used a randomized crossover design to compare the impact of two types of instructor-generated videos on university students in a large-enrollment physiology course. We compared videos featuring only an instructor with videos featuring an instructor tutoring a student. We found that students preferred, enjoyed, and valued the Instructor Only videos significantly more than the Instructor-Tutee videos. Additionally, below-average students performed significantly better on physiology quizzes after watching Instructor Only videos compared with Instructor-Tutee videos. Above average students performed equivalently on physiology quizzes after watching Instructor Only or Instructor-Tutee videos. This study applies cognitive science to a classroom practice.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Journal | CEUR Workshop Proceedings |
| Volume | 2128 |
| State | Published - 2018 |
| Event | 2018 Practitioner and Industrial Track at ICLS, RIPI-ICLS 2018 - London, United Kingdom Duration: Jun 26 2018 → Jun 27 2018 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Computer Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the impact of different types of instructor generated videos on student learning in a university physiology course'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS