TY - JOUR
T1 - Exoplanet Biosignatures
T2 - At the Dawn of a New Era of Planetary Observations
AU - Kiang, Nancy Y.
AU - Domagal-Goldman, Shawn
AU - Parenteau, Mary N.
AU - Catling, David C.
AU - Fujii, Yuka
AU - Meadows, Victoria S.
AU - Schwieterman, Edward W.
AU - Walker, Sara
N1 - Funding Information:
The Exoplanet Biosignatures Workshop Without Walls (EBWWW) could not have been possible without the support of Mary Voytek, director of NASA's Astrobiology Program and the Nexus of Exoplanet System Science, and Carl Pilcher and Penny Boston, former and current directors of the NASA Astrobiology Institute. Thanks are also due to the many scientists who led the several cross-disciplinary discussion activities of the workshop. The Science Organizing Committee: Daniel Apai, Shawn Domagal-Goldman (co-chair), Yuka Fujii, Lee Grenfell, Nancy Y. Kiang (cochair), Adrian Lenardic, Nikole Lewis, Timothy Lyons, Hilairy Hartnett, Bill Moore, Enric Palle', Niki Parenteau (co-chair), Heike Rauer, Karl Stapelfeldt, Sara Walker. Online discussion and in-person workshop speakers and participants: SOC named above as well as Giada Arney, William Bains, Robert Blankenship, David Catling, CharlesCockell, David Crisp, Sebastian Danielache, Shiladitya DasSarma, Russell Deitrick, Anthony Del Genio, Drake Deming, Steve Desch, David Des Marais, Theresa Fisher, Sonny Harman, Erika Harnett, Siddharth Hegde, Yasunori Hori, Renyu Hu, Betül Kacïar, Jeremy Leconte, Andrew Lincowski, Rodrigo Luger, Victoria Meadows, Adam Monroe, Norio Narita, Christopher Reinhard, Sarah Rugheimer, Andrew Rushby, Edward Schwieterman, Nick Siegler, Evgenya Skolnick, Harrison Smith, Motohide Tamura, and Margaret Turnbull. We also wish to thank the numerous other scientists who contributed valuable input and energy, remotely participating in discussions and providing comments in the EBWWW online discussion forum. We are grateful to Mike Toillion and Julia Figliotti for nimble responses in ensuring our online tools smoothly enabled interactions among geographically widely distributed community members. The work on this paper was supported by: the NASA Astrobiology Program's Nexus for Exoplanet System Science (NExSS) funding for the ROCKE-3D (Resolving Orbital and Climate Keys of Earth and Extraterrestrial Environments with Dynamics) team (node 13-13NAI7-2-0007) and the Planet Formation team at Arizona State University; the NASA Astrobiology Institute's (NAI) teams, Virtual Planetary Laboratory (Cooperative Agreement Number: CAN NNA13AA93A) and Alternative Earths (CAN NNA15BB03A); NASA's internal science funding of the Sellers Exoplanet Environments Collaboration (SEEC); and the NASA Postdoctoral Program, Universities Space Research Association. Financial support for Open Access page charges was provided by NExSS.
Funding Information:
The work on this paper was supported by: the NASA Astrobiology Program’s Nexus for Exoplanet System Science (NExSS) funding for the ROCKE-3D (Resolving Orbital and Climate Keys of Earth and Extraterrestrial Environments with Dynamics) team (node 13-13NAI7_2-0007) and the Planet Formation team at Arizona State University; the NASA Astrobiology Institute’s (NAI) teams, Virtual Planetary Laboratory (Cooperative Agreement Number: CAN NNA13AA93A) and Alternative Earths (CAN NNA15BB03A); NASA’s internal science funding of the Sellers Exoplanet Environments Collaboration (SEEC); and the NASA Postdoctoral Program, Universities Space Research Association. Financial support for Open Access page charges was provided by NExSS.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Nancy Y. Kiang et al.
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - The rapid rate of discoveries of exoplanets has expanded the scope of the science possible for the remote detection of life beyond Earth. The Exoplanet Biosignatures Workshop Without Walls (EBWWW) held in 2016 engaged the international scientific community across diverse scientific disciplines, to assess the state of the science and technology in the search for life on exoplanets, and to identify paths for progress. The workshop activities resulted in five major review papers, which provide (1) an encyclopedic review of known and proposed biosignatures and models used to ascertain them (Schwieterman et al., 2018 in this issue); (2) an in-depth review of O2 as a biosignature, rigorously examining the nuances of false positives and false negatives for evidence of life (Meadows et al., 2018 in this issue); (3) a Bayesian framework to comprehensively organize current understanding to quantify confidence in biosignature assessments (Catling et al., 2018 in this issue); (4) an extension of that Bayesian framework in anticipation of increasing planetary data and novel concepts of biosignatures (Walker et al., 2018 in this issue); and (5) a review of the upcoming telescope capabilities to characterize exoplanets and their environment (Fujii et al., 2018 in this issue). Because of the immense content of these review papers, this summary provides a guide to their complementary scope and highlights salient features. Strong themes that emerged from the workshop were that biosignatures must be interpreted in the context of their environment, and that frameworks must be developed to link diverse forms of scientific understanding of that context to quantify the likelihood that a biosignature has been observed. Models are needed to explore the parameter space where measurements will be widespread but sparse in detail. Given the technological prospects for large ground-based telescopes and space-based observatories, the detection of atmospheric signatures of a few potentially habitable planets may come before 2030.
AB - The rapid rate of discoveries of exoplanets has expanded the scope of the science possible for the remote detection of life beyond Earth. The Exoplanet Biosignatures Workshop Without Walls (EBWWW) held in 2016 engaged the international scientific community across diverse scientific disciplines, to assess the state of the science and technology in the search for life on exoplanets, and to identify paths for progress. The workshop activities resulted in five major review papers, which provide (1) an encyclopedic review of known and proposed biosignatures and models used to ascertain them (Schwieterman et al., 2018 in this issue); (2) an in-depth review of O2 as a biosignature, rigorously examining the nuances of false positives and false negatives for evidence of life (Meadows et al., 2018 in this issue); (3) a Bayesian framework to comprehensively organize current understanding to quantify confidence in biosignature assessments (Catling et al., 2018 in this issue); (4) an extension of that Bayesian framework in anticipation of increasing planetary data and novel concepts of biosignatures (Walker et al., 2018 in this issue); and (5) a review of the upcoming telescope capabilities to characterize exoplanets and their environment (Fujii et al., 2018 in this issue). Because of the immense content of these review papers, this summary provides a guide to their complementary scope and highlights salient features. Strong themes that emerged from the workshop were that biosignatures must be interpreted in the context of their environment, and that frameworks must be developed to link diverse forms of scientific understanding of that context to quantify the likelihood that a biosignature has been observed. Models are needed to explore the parameter space where measurements will be widespread but sparse in detail. Given the technological prospects for large ground-based telescopes and space-based observatories, the detection of atmospheric signatures of a few potentially habitable planets may come before 2030.
KW - Bayesian analysis
KW - Biosignatures
KW - Exoplanets
KW - Remote observation
KW - Spectral imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049068471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049068471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/ast.2018.1862
DO - 10.1089/ast.2018.1862
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29741918
AN - SCOPUS:85049068471
SN - 1531-1074
VL - 18
SP - 619
EP - 629
JO - Astrobiology
JF - Astrobiology
IS - 6
ER -