Evidence-based recommendations for recorded-meetings policies

Stephen Carradini, Kristen Getchell, Peter Cardon, Carolin Fleischmann, Jolanta Aritz, James Stapp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recordings of virtual meetings have become a common part of virtual and hybrid workplace environments. Meeting recordings offer potential benefits (e.g., speedy transcript production, expedited information sharing, searchable information, inclusion of visual and tonal expressions) and drawbacks (e.g., difficulty discussing sensitive issues, employee privacy, limited off-the-record capabilities, and employee concerns over sharing recordings). Given this variance, policies for virtual meetings are a necessity. Managers can successfully implement a policy by cocreating policy preferences with employees in open-ended and nonjudgmental conversations that openly discuss potential benefits, drawbacks, and employee concerns. Topics such as when to record, when not to record, how to gain consent, and who will have administrative and sharing rights should be covered. Areas of less urgency that may yet be part of these discussions include accessibility concerns, the use or rejection of software features, where and for how long meeting recordings should be stored, and such emerging issues as the use of virtual reality and AI tools. Managers should deliver policy preferences to a group of representatives from Human Resources, Information Technology, and the executive team to compose the policy, request a legal review, and to introduce and implement it in the organization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)83-92
Number of pages10
JournalBusiness Horizons
Volume67
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Keywords

  • Employee consent
  • Employee privacy
  • GDPR
  • Psychological safety
  • Recorded meetings
  • Virtual meetings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Marketing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-based recommendations for recorded-meetings policies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this