Evaluating journal quality: Is the H-index a better measure than impact factors?

David Hodge, Jeffrey R. Lacasse

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    73 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Objectives: This study evaluates the utility of a new measure-the h-index-that may provide a more valid approach to evaluating journal quality in the social work profession. Method: H-index values are compared with Thomson ISI 5-year impact factors and expert opinion. Results: As hypothesized, the h-index correlates highly with ISI 5-year impact factors; but exhibits closer agreement with expert opinion, particularly with high familiarity disciplinary journals. Conclusions: This evidence of convergent and discriminatory validity suggests that the h-index may have some utility in assessing social work journals. Notable advantages of the h-index include its compatibility with the profession's applied research culture and its ability to be used with essentially all journals in which social workers publish.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)222-230
    Number of pages9
    JournalResearch on Social Work Practice
    Volume21
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 2011

    Keywords

    • Bibliometrics
    • Impact factors
    • Journal quality
    • h-index

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Psychology(all)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating journal quality: Is the H-index a better measure than impact factors?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this