TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethnographic methods
T2 - Training norms and practices and the future of American anthropology
AU - Negrón, Rosalyn
AU - Wutich, Amber
AU - Russell Bernard, H.
AU - Brewis, Alexandra
AU - Ruth, Alissa
AU - Mayfour, Katherine
AU - Piperata, Barbara
AU - Beresford, Melissa
AU - SturtzSreetharan, Cindi
AU - Mahdavi, Pardis
AU - Hardin, Jessica
AU - Zarger, Rebecca
AU - Harper, Krista
AU - Jones, James Holland
AU - Gravlee, Clarence C.
AU - Brayboy, Bryan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). American Anthropologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Anthropological Association.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - American anthropology is engaged in significant self-reckonings that call for big changes to how anthropology is practiced. These include (1) recognizing and taking seriously the demands to decolonize the ways research is done, (2) addressing precarious employment in academic anthropology, and (3) creating a discipline better positioned to respond to urgent societal needs. A central role for ethnographic methods training is a thread that runs through each of these three reckonings. This article, written by a team of cultural, biocultural, and linguistic anthropologists, outlines key connections between ethnographic methods training and the challenges facing anthropology. We draw on insights from a large-scale survey of American Anthropological Association members to examine current ethnographic methods capabilities and training practices. Study findings are presented and explored to answer three guiding questions: To what extent do our current anthropological practices in ethnographic methods training serve to advance or undermine current calls for disciplinary change? To what extent do instructors themselves identify disconnects between their own practices and the need for innovation? And, finally, what can be done, and at what scale, to leverage ethnographic methods training to meet calls for disciplinary change?.
AB - American anthropology is engaged in significant self-reckonings that call for big changes to how anthropology is practiced. These include (1) recognizing and taking seriously the demands to decolonize the ways research is done, (2) addressing precarious employment in academic anthropology, and (3) creating a discipline better positioned to respond to urgent societal needs. A central role for ethnographic methods training is a thread that runs through each of these three reckonings. This article, written by a team of cultural, biocultural, and linguistic anthropologists, outlines key connections between ethnographic methods training and the challenges facing anthropology. We draw on insights from a large-scale survey of American Anthropological Association members to examine current ethnographic methods capabilities and training practices. Study findings are presented and explored to answer three guiding questions: To what extent do our current anthropological practices in ethnographic methods training serve to advance or undermine current calls for disciplinary change? To what extent do instructors themselves identify disconnects between their own practices and the need for innovation? And, finally, what can be done, and at what scale, to leverage ethnographic methods training to meet calls for disciplinary change?.
KW - American anthropology
KW - ethnographic research
KW - graduate education
KW - methods training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198650619&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85198650619&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/aman.13991
DO - 10.1111/aman.13991
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85198650619
SN - 0002-7294
VL - 126
SP - 458
EP - 469
JO - American Anthropologist
JF - American Anthropologist
IS - 3
ER -