Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards

Jessica Vitak, Nicholas Proferes, Katie Shilton, Zahra Ashktorab

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Scopus citations


The parallel rise of pervasive data collection platforms and computational methods for collecting, analyzing, and drawing inferences from large quantities of user data has advanced social computing research, investigating digital traces to understand mediated behaviors of individuals, groups, and societies. At the same time, methods employed to access these data have raised questions about ethical research practices. This article provides insights into U.S. institutional review boards’ (IRBs) attitudes and practices regulating social computing research. Through descriptive and inferential analysis of survey data from staff at 59 IRBs at research universities, we examine how IRBs evaluate the growing variety of studies using pervasive digital data. Findings unpack the difficulties IRB staff face evaluating increasingly technical research proposals while highlighting the belief in their ability to surmount these difficulties. They also indicate a lack of consensus among IRB staff about what should be reviewed and a willingness to work closely with researchers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)372-382
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Issue number5
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017
Externally publishedYes


  • IRBs
  • big data
  • ethics
  • institutional review boards
  • social computing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Communication


Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this