Ethics Abroad: Fieldwork in Fragile and Violent Contexts

Kate Cronin-Furman, Milli Lake

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

106 Scopus citations


The diversity of political spaces, availability of cheap labor, ease of access to powerful figures, and safety net of a foreign passport attract researchers to the developing world. However, environments of extreme state weakness and ongoing conflict permit research behavior that would be frowned on in the global north. We suggest that weak regulatory authority in conflict-affected states offers foreign academics opportunities that are not available when states have greater reach or capacity. Qualitative researchers may find requests to interview victims or perpetrators of wartime violence granted with ease. Experimenters can coerce under-resourced NGOs to pursue interventions at odds with their organizational mandates. We posit that conflict contexts can constitute permissive environments in which researchers can engage in conduct that would be considered deeply problematic at home. Because studying political violence can require firsthand research on aspects of political life not easily observed elsewhere, this article offers a set of guidelines to foster more ethical and responsible research practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)607-614
Number of pages8
JournalPS - Political Science and Politics
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics Abroad: Fieldwork in Fragile and Violent Contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this