TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on survival in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis
AU - Lindor, K. D.
AU - Therneau, T. M.
AU - Jorgensen, R. A.
AU - Malinchoc, M.
AU - Dickson, E. R.
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - Background and Aims: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis; however, its effect on patient survival is less certain. To study this issue, the survival of patients receiving long-term UDCA treatment was compared with that of a control group, adjusting for their risk scores based on the Mayo model. Methods: One hundred eighty patients were randomized to receive either 13-15 mg · kg-1 · day-1 UDCA (n = 89) or placebo (n = 91). After the study closure, the patients originally receiving placebo were switched to active drug, and prospective follow-up was continued for 3 years. Patients were censored at the time of transplantation, voluntary withdrawal, or crossover of the placebo group (efficacy analysis). The survival of the two groups was adjusted for risk scores at the time of entry to the study. A secondary analysis was an intent-to-treat analysis, whereby patients were followed up regardless of their voluntary withdrawal or crossover. Results: At the time of analysis, the patients receiving placebo had a significantly increased risk of death and/or requiring transplantation (relative risk, 2.6; P = 0.04) compared with the UDCA-treated patients. Conclusions: UDCA should be considered as a safe, effective, and life-extending treatment for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
AB - Background and Aims: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis; however, its effect on patient survival is less certain. To study this issue, the survival of patients receiving long-term UDCA treatment was compared with that of a control group, adjusting for their risk scores based on the Mayo model. Methods: One hundred eighty patients were randomized to receive either 13-15 mg · kg-1 · day-1 UDCA (n = 89) or placebo (n = 91). After the study closure, the patients originally receiving placebo were switched to active drug, and prospective follow-up was continued for 3 years. Patients were censored at the time of transplantation, voluntary withdrawal, or crossover of the placebo group (efficacy analysis). The survival of the two groups was adjusted for risk scores at the time of entry to the study. A secondary analysis was an intent-to-treat analysis, whereby patients were followed up regardless of their voluntary withdrawal or crossover. Results: At the time of analysis, the patients receiving placebo had a significantly increased risk of death and/or requiring transplantation (relative risk, 2.6; P = 0.04) compared with the UDCA-treated patients. Conclusions: UDCA should be considered as a safe, effective, and life-extending treatment for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029911629&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029911629&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8613058
DO - 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8613058
M3 - Article
C2 - 8613058
AN - SCOPUS:0029911629
SN - 0016-5085
VL - 110
SP - 1515
EP - 1518
JO - Gastroenterology
JF - Gastroenterology
IS - 5
ER -