Abstract
Poskitt and Tremayne 74 (1987) present a posterior odds ratio (R) portfolio selection strategy for ARMA models. This paper makes the range of prediction error variances that are implicit in R more explicit. Model closeness is quantified using a distance function in a Hilbert space. The relationship between distance and the posterior odds ratio is demonstrated. This provides a distance interpretation of the posterior odds ratio. The distance function also makes it possible to develop a prediction error variance (p.e.v.) criterion for identifying models to include in an ARMA model portfolio. A simulation experiment shows that the p.e.v. criterion provides forecasters with both a measure for assessing the likelihood that the models in an ARMA model portfolio yield practically equivalent forecasts, and a measure for assessing the usefulness of alternative criteria for identifying the order of an ARMA model.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 41-52 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | International Journal of Forecasting |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2004 |
Keywords
- Distance
- Information criteria
- Misspecification error
- Order determination
- Posterior odds ratio
- Prediction error variance
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management