TY - JOUR
T1 - Detroit River phosphorus loads
T2 - Anatomy of a binational watershed
AU - Scavia, Donald
AU - Bocaniov, Serghei A.
AU - Dagnew, Awoke
AU - Hu, Yao
AU - Kerkez, Branko
AU - Long, Colleen M.
AU - Muenich, Rebecca L.
AU - Read, Jennifer
AU - Vaccaro, Lynn
AU - Wang, Yu Chen
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge our project sponsor the Fred A. and Barbara M. Erb Family Foundation. In addition, to providing a grant (grant# 903) that supported most of the research summarized in this paper, Foundation staff, especially Melissa Damaschke, provided important guidance and insights as we were planning and executing the project. We sincerely appreciate the many contributions of our project advisory group ( www.myumi.ch/detroit-river), which generously shared their expertise and took time to review documents and attend meetings. The group helped us access additional data, improve model assumptions, and stay connected to an evolving policy context. In addition to the advisory group, this project benefited from consultations with experts that provided insights, advice and in many cases data. We would like the thank the following individuals: Dave Schwab and Rob Goodspeed from the University of Michigan; Margaret Kalcic from Ohio State University; Robert Hirsch from USGS; Debbie Burniston, Sean Backus, Luis Leon, and Reza Valipour from Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ngan Diep from Ontario Ministry of Environment, Conservations and Parks; Mary Lynn Semegen, Bill Creal, and Catherine Willey from the Great Lakes Water Authority; Pamela Joose from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Karen Maaskant from Upper Thames River Conservation Authority; Matthew Maccoux from the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District; Dong Zhang from the Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change; Edward Lynch from Detroit Future Cities; and Rick Duff from the Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge our project sponsor the Fred A. and Barbara M. Erb Family Foundation. In addition, to providing a grant (grant# 903) that supported most of the research summarized in this paper, Foundation staff, especially Melissa Damaschke, provided important guidance and insights as we were planning and executing the project. We sincerely appreciate the many contributions of our project advisory group ( www.myumi.ch/detroit-river ), which generously shared their expertise and took time to review documents and attend meetings. The group helped us access additional data, improve model assumptions, and stay connected to an evolving policy context. In addition to the advisory group, this project benefited from consultations with experts that provided insights, advice and in many cases data. We would like the thank the following individuals: Dave Schwab and Rob Goodspeed from the University of Michigan; Margaret Kalcic from Ohio State University; Robert Hirsch from USGS; Debbie Burniston, Sean Backus, Luis Leon, and Reza Valipour from Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ngan Diep from Ontario Ministry of Environment, Conservations and Parks; Mary Lynn Semegen, Bill Creal, and Catherine Willey from the Great Lakes Water Authority; Pamela Joose from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Karen Maaskant from Upper Thames River Conservation Authority; Matthew Maccoux from the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District; Dong Zhang from the Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change; Edward Lynch from Detroit Future Cities; and Rick Duff from the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Appendix A
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 International Association for Great Lakes Research
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - As a result of increased harmful algal blooms and hypoxia in Lake Erie, the US and Canada revised their phosphorus loading targets under the 2012 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. The focus of this paper is the Detroit River and its watershed, a source of 25% of the total phosphorus (TP) load to Lake Erie. Its load declined 37% since 1998, due chiefly to improvements at the regional Great Lakes Water Authority Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) in Detroit and phosphorus sequestered by zebra and quagga mussels in Lake Huron. In addition to the 54% of the load from Lake Huron, nonpoint sources contribute 57% of the TP load and 50% of the dissolved reactive phosphorus load, with the remaining balance from point sources. After Lake Huron, the largest source is the WRRF, which has already reduced its load by over 40%. Currently, loads from Lake Huron and further reductions from the WRRF are not part of the reduction strategy, therefore remaining watershed sources will need to decline by 72% to meet the Water Quality Agreement target - a daunting challenge. Because other urban sources are very small, most of the reduction would have to come from agriculturally-dominated lands. The most effective way to reduce those loads is to apply combinations of practices like cover crops, buffer strips, wetlands, and applying fertilizer below the soil surface on the lands with the highest phosphorus losses. However, our simulations suggest even extensive conservation on those lands may not be enough.
AB - As a result of increased harmful algal blooms and hypoxia in Lake Erie, the US and Canada revised their phosphorus loading targets under the 2012 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. The focus of this paper is the Detroit River and its watershed, a source of 25% of the total phosphorus (TP) load to Lake Erie. Its load declined 37% since 1998, due chiefly to improvements at the regional Great Lakes Water Authority Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) in Detroit and phosphorus sequestered by zebra and quagga mussels in Lake Huron. In addition to the 54% of the load from Lake Huron, nonpoint sources contribute 57% of the TP load and 50% of the dissolved reactive phosphorus load, with the remaining balance from point sources. After Lake Huron, the largest source is the WRRF, which has already reduced its load by over 40%. Currently, loads from Lake Huron and further reductions from the WRRF are not part of the reduction strategy, therefore remaining watershed sources will need to decline by 72% to meet the Water Quality Agreement target - a daunting challenge. Because other urban sources are very small, most of the reduction would have to come from agriculturally-dominated lands. The most effective way to reduce those loads is to apply combinations of practices like cover crops, buffer strips, wetlands, and applying fertilizer below the soil surface on the lands with the highest phosphorus losses. However, our simulations suggest even extensive conservation on those lands may not be enough.
KW - Detroit River
KW - Lake Erie
KW - Lake Huron
KW - Load reduction
KW - Nutrient loads
KW - Phosphorus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075437527&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075437527&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jglr.2019.09.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jglr.2019.09.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85075437527
SN - 0380-1330
VL - 45
SP - 1150
EP - 1161
JO - Journal of Great Lakes Research
JF - Journal of Great Lakes Research
IS - 6
ER -