Desert, Control, and Moral Responsibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


In this paper, I take it for granted both that there are two types of blameworthiness—accountability blameworthiness and attributability blameworthiness—and that avoidability is necessary only for the former. My task, then, is to explain why avoidability is necessary for accountability blameworthiness but not for attributability blameworthiness. I argue that what explains this is both the fact that these two types of blameworthiness make different sorts of reactive attitudes fitting and that only one of these two types of attitudes requires having been able to refrain from φ-ing in order for them to be fitting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-426
Number of pages20
JournalActa Analytica
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy


Dive into the research topics of 'Desert, Control, and Moral Responsibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this