TY - JOUR
T1 - Contrast Effects in Flavour Preference Learning
AU - Capaldi, Elizabeth
AU - Sheffer, Joan D.
AU - Pulley, Rebecca J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Requests for reprints should be sent to E. D. Capaldi, Department of Psychology, University of Florida. Gainesville, Florida 3261 I, U.S.A. This research was supported in part by Grant MH39453 to the first author.
PY - 1989/8/1
Y1 - 1989/8/1
N2 - In four experiments the role of contrast effects in producing learned flavour preferences was examined. The experiments showed that contrast effects are pervasive in flavour preference learning, producing results that are often paradoxical from a traditional reinforcement point of view. In Experiment 1, rats preferred a reinforced flavour over a nonreinforced flavour more if the reinforcer was 1% sucrose than if the reinforcer was 8% sucrose. Because the cue flavour was dissolved in 8% sucrose, this represents an anticipatory positive contrast effect. In Experiment 2, the relationship between cue and consequence was shown to be important in flavour preference learning, as expected if contrast effects are involved. In Experiment 3, rats preferred a flavour that was reinforced 4 times, and they preferred this flavour more than one reinforced 8 times, presumably because the greater the expectancy of the consequence, the greater the anticipatory negative contrast. In Experiment 4, rats consumed less of 0.15% saccharin if they received 32% sucrose randomly 90 min either before or after the 0.15% saccharin than if they received only 0.15% saccharin, a simultaneous negative contrast effect.
AB - In four experiments the role of contrast effects in producing learned flavour preferences was examined. The experiments showed that contrast effects are pervasive in flavour preference learning, producing results that are often paradoxical from a traditional reinforcement point of view. In Experiment 1, rats preferred a reinforced flavour over a nonreinforced flavour more if the reinforcer was 1% sucrose than if the reinforcer was 8% sucrose. Because the cue flavour was dissolved in 8% sucrose, this represents an anticipatory positive contrast effect. In Experiment 2, the relationship between cue and consequence was shown to be important in flavour preference learning, as expected if contrast effects are involved. In Experiment 3, rats preferred a flavour that was reinforced 4 times, and they preferred this flavour more than one reinforced 8 times, presumably because the greater the expectancy of the consequence, the greater the anticipatory negative contrast. In Experiment 4, rats consumed less of 0.15% saccharin if they received 32% sucrose randomly 90 min either before or after the 0.15% saccharin than if they received only 0.15% saccharin, a simultaneous negative contrast effect.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024710621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024710621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14640748908401198
DO - 10.1080/14640748908401198
M3 - Article
C2 - 2798929
AN - SCOPUS:0024710621
SN - 0272-4995
VL - 41
SP - 307
EP - 323
JO - The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B
JF - The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B
IS - 3
ER -