TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of averaging methods for interface conductivities in one-dimensional unsaturated flow in layered unsaturated soils
AU - Liu, Ruowen
AU - Welfert, Bruno
AU - Houston, Sandra
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the National Sciences Foundation (NSF) under grant number CMMI-0825089. The opinions, conclusions, and interpretations expressed in this paper are those of the authors, and not necessarily of NSF.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Numerical simulations of water flow through unsaturated soils have been well studied but very few studies have addressed water movement across soil interfaces by imposing continuity of both flux and pressure head. Imposing continuity of both head and flux leads, at a local discrete level, to a nonlinear interface equation which may exhibit multiple solutions if the spatial discretization is not fine enough, for example during infiltration with sharp fronts or in the presence of very dissimilar soil layers. The non-uniqueness of solutions of the interface equation can lead to numerical errors and/or numerical oscillations. We use a staggered finite difference approach with cell-centered hydraulic conductivities estimated by averaging nodal conductivities. We evaluate the impact of several averaging schemes (arithmetic, harmonic, geometric and log-mean) on the occurrence of multiple solutions and associated numerical issues. The resulting numerical schemes are compared in terms of their propensity to trigger multiple roots at soil interfaces. Our results show that the choice of averaging scheme does affect the occurrence of multiple solutions and long term behavior of the numerical solution. In particular, our simulations confirm that the averaging schemes associated with larger interface conductivities (log-mean and arithmetic mean) are less likely to suffer from non-uniqueness issues of the interface problem.
AB - Numerical simulations of water flow through unsaturated soils have been well studied but very few studies have addressed water movement across soil interfaces by imposing continuity of both flux and pressure head. Imposing continuity of both head and flux leads, at a local discrete level, to a nonlinear interface equation which may exhibit multiple solutions if the spatial discretization is not fine enough, for example during infiltration with sharp fronts or in the presence of very dissimilar soil layers. The non-uniqueness of solutions of the interface equation can lead to numerical errors and/or numerical oscillations. We use a staggered finite difference approach with cell-centered hydraulic conductivities estimated by averaging nodal conductivities. We evaluate the impact of several averaging schemes (arithmetic, harmonic, geometric and log-mean) on the occurrence of multiple solutions and associated numerical issues. The resulting numerical schemes are compared in terms of their propensity to trigger multiple roots at soil interfaces. Our results show that the choice of averaging scheme does affect the occurrence of multiple solutions and long term behavior of the numerical solution. In particular, our simulations confirm that the averaging schemes associated with larger interface conductivities (log-mean and arithmetic mean) are less likely to suffer from non-uniqueness issues of the interface problem.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018729334&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018729334&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/9780784480472.078
DO - 10.1061/9780784480472.078
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85018729334
SN - 0895-0563
SP - 736
EP - 745
JO - Geotechnical Special Publication
JF - Geotechnical Special Publication
IS - GSP 280
T2 - Geotechnical Frontiers 2017
Y2 - 12 March 2017 through 15 March 2017
ER -