Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Commentary on Johnson v. M’Intosh

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Johnson v. M’Intosh1 is the first case in Chief Justice John Marshall’s trilogy of Indian law opinions.2 Two centuries later, these decisions remain the foundation of the legal, political, and sovereign status of Indian tribes within the United States. While concluding that both the property rights and sovereign powers of Indigenous nations are inferior to the property rights and sovereign powers of Christian European nations, Johnson specifically held that “Indians”3 lack the right to fully alienate their lands to anyone other than the United States government.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationFeminist Judgments
Subtitle of host publicationRewritten Property Opinions
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages35-60
Number of pages26
ISBN (Electronic)9781108890922
ISBN (Print)9781108835534
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Commentary on Johnson v. M’Intosh'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this