Cognitive strategies, expectancy, and coping style in the control of pain

Thomas M. Beers, Paul Karoly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Scopus citations


Measures of tolerance, self-reported pain threshold, and overall discomfort of cold-pressor pain were obtained from 114 male undergraduates in a pretest-training-posttest experiment. Training consisted of brief practice in 1 of 4 cognitive strategies: rational thinking, compatible imagery, incompatible imagery, and task-irrelevant cognition. Analyses of covariance indicated that (a) cognitive-imaginal strategies facilitated endurance of pain and raised self-reported threshold, (b) rational thinking and compatible imagery were generally the most effective treatments, (c) expectancy alone was not a significant pain-attenuating factor, (d) treatments did not affect discomfort ratings, and (e) individual differences in imaginal ability and coping style did not correlate with changes in any of the dependent measures. (3 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-180
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of consulting and clinical psychology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 1979
Externally publishedYes


  • discomfort, male college students
  • rational thinking vs compatible vs incompatible imagery cognitive strategy, pain tolerance &
  • threshold &

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health


Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive strategies, expectancy, and coping style in the control of pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this