TY - JOUR
T1 - Calibration of low-cost no2 sensors through environmental factor correction
AU - Miech, Jason A.
AU - Stanton, Levi
AU - Gao, Meiling
AU - Micalizzi, Paolo
AU - Uebelherr, Joshua
AU - Herckes, Pierre
AU - Fraser, Matthew P.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This work was funded by the Maricopa County Air Quality Department.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Low-cost air quality sensors (LCSs) have become more widespread due to their low cost and increased capabilities; however, to supplement more traditional air quality networks, the performance of these LCSs needs to be validated. This study focused on NO2 measurements from eight Clarity Node-S sensors and used various environmental factors to calibrate the LCSs. To validate the calibration performance, we calculated the root-mean-square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), R2, and slope compared to reference measurements. Raw results from six of these sensors were comparable to those reported for other NO2 LCSs; however, two of the evaluated LCSs had RMSE values ~20 ppb higher than the other six LCSs. By applying a sensor-specific calibration that corrects for relative humidity, temperature, and ozone, this discrepancy was mitigated. In addition, this calibration improved the RMSE, MAE, R2, and slope of all eight LCS compared to the raw data. It should be noted that relatively stable environmental conditions over the course of the LCS deployment period benefited calibration performance over time. These results demonstrate the importance of developing LCS calibration models for individual sensors that consider pertinent environmental factors.
AB - Low-cost air quality sensors (LCSs) have become more widespread due to their low cost and increased capabilities; however, to supplement more traditional air quality networks, the performance of these LCSs needs to be validated. This study focused on NO2 measurements from eight Clarity Node-S sensors and used various environmental factors to calibrate the LCSs. To validate the calibration performance, we calculated the root-mean-square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), R2, and slope compared to reference measurements. Raw results from six of these sensors were comparable to those reported for other NO2 LCSs; however, two of the evaluated LCSs had RMSE values ~20 ppb higher than the other six LCSs. By applying a sensor-specific calibration that corrects for relative humidity, temperature, and ozone, this discrepancy was mitigated. In addition, this calibration improved the RMSE, MAE, R2, and slope of all eight LCS compared to the raw data. It should be noted that relatively stable environmental conditions over the course of the LCS deployment period benefited calibration performance over time. These results demonstrate the importance of developing LCS calibration models for individual sensors that consider pertinent environmental factors.
KW - Air quality
KW - Low-cost sensors
KW - Nitrogen dioxide
KW - Ozone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118278477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85118278477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/toxics9110281
DO - 10.3390/toxics9110281
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85118278477
SN - 2305-6304
VL - 9
JO - Toxics
JF - Toxics
IS - 11
M1 - 281
ER -