Breaking the elected rules in a field experiment on forestry resources

Marcus Janssen, François Bousquet, Juan Camilo Cardenas, Daniel Castillo, Kobchai Worrapimphong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations


Harvesting from common resources has been studied through experimental work in the laboratory and in the field. In this paper we report on a dynamic commons experiment, representing a forest, performed with different types of communities of resource users in Thailand and Colombia, as well as student participants. We find that all groups overharvest the resource in the first part of the experiment and that there is no statistical difference between the various types of groups. In the second part of the experiment, participants appropriate the common resource after one of three possible regulations is elected and implemented. There is less overharvesting after the rules are implemented, but there is a significant amount of rule breaking. The surprising finding is that Colombian villagers break the rules of the games more often than other groups, and even more so when they have more trust in members of the community. This observation can be explained by the distrust in externally proposed regulations due to the institutional and cultural context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)132-139
Number of pages8
JournalEcological Economics
StatePublished - Jun 2013


  • Common pool resources
  • Dynamic games
  • Field experiments
  • Forestry
  • Rule compliance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Breaking the elected rules in a field experiment on forestry resources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this