Abstract
In their original statement of the reformulated model of learned helplessness, Abramson, Seligman, and Teasdale (1978) argued that internality is related to depression through self-esteem, whereas stability and globality only have direct relationships with depression. A test of this model using path analysis (N = 289) provided support for the predicted indirect relationship between internality and depression. However, contrary to the model, globality was significantly related to self-esteem, and the relation between stability and depression was not significant. Several models proposing interactions between the attributional style dimensions were also tested; none of the interactions tested attained statistical significance. The methodological and conceptual implications of these findings for the reformulated model of learned helplessness are discussed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 57-69 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Research in Personality |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1991 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- General Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Attributional style in relation to self-esteem and depression: Mediational and interactive models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS