TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the South Korean Model of Emergency Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic
AU - Kim, Min Hyu
AU - Cho, Wonhyuk
AU - Choi, Hemin
AU - Hur, Joon Young
N1 - Funding Information:
The contributions made by Hemin Choi and Wonhyuk Cho were partially supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF‐2017S1A3A2065838). The contribution made by Joon-Young Hur was supported by the KIPA (basic research 2012-27). All errors are the responsibility of the authors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 Asian Studies Association of Australia.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented global public health crisis, and governments have implemented various responses with varying degrees of effectiveness. South Korea’s approach, which has involved minimal lockdown in order to “flatten the curve”, and which offers an alternative for many democracies, has attracted much attention. Based on in-depth interviews with public health professionals and policy advisors in government agencies, this article analyses how well South Korea’s response to COVID-19 complies with the expectations of good governance, and assesses the strengths and challenges of the Korean model. Our analysis shows that South Korea has been reactive rather than preventive/passive amid waves of clusters such as outbreaks in nightclubs, e-commerce warehouses, schools, hospitals and religious gatherings. The government has used a range of countermeasures, including contact tracing, diagnostic testing, media briefings and text alerts. At the same time, the challenges for the Korean approach have been concerns about privacy, fatigue over emergency alerts and politicisation.
AB - The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented global public health crisis, and governments have implemented various responses with varying degrees of effectiveness. South Korea’s approach, which has involved minimal lockdown in order to “flatten the curve”, and which offers an alternative for many democracies, has attracted much attention. Based on in-depth interviews with public health professionals and policy advisors in government agencies, this article analyses how well South Korea’s response to COVID-19 complies with the expectations of good governance, and assesses the strengths and challenges of the Korean model. Our analysis shows that South Korea has been reactive rather than preventive/passive amid waves of clusters such as outbreaks in nightclubs, e-commerce warehouses, schools, hospitals and religious gatherings. The government has used a range of countermeasures, including contact tracing, diagnostic testing, media briefings and text alerts. At the same time, the challenges for the Korean approach have been concerns about privacy, fatigue over emergency alerts and politicisation.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Pandemic
KW - South Korea
KW - emergency management
KW - good governance
KW - public health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087801217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087801217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10357823.2020.1779658
DO - 10.1080/10357823.2020.1779658
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087801217
SN - 1035-7823
SP - 567
EP - 578
JO - Asian Studies Review
JF - Asian Studies Review
ER -