TY - GEN
T1 - Adaptive Scale-Similar Closure for Large Eddy Simulations. Part 1
T2 - AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, AIAA SciTech Forum 2022
AU - Stallcup, Eric W.
AU - Kshitij, Abhinav
AU - Dahm, Werner J.A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge numerous very useful discussions with Emilio Torres at Arizona State University. We also gratefully acknowledge many insightful and inspiring discussions with Prof. Peter Hamlington, as well as assistance from Colin Towery, both at CU Boulder, who also provided the SpectralLES code used in parts of this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - We propose and demonstrate an adaptive scale-similar closure approach that can represent subgrid terms accurately and stably even at or near the smallest resolved scales of a simulation. This dynamic approach is based on scale similarity and generalized representations of subgrid terms from the complete and minimal tensor representation theory of Smith (1971). The tensor polynomial coefficients in the generalized representation are adapted to the local turbulence state by solving a local system identification problem at a test-filter scale. The resulting test-scale coefficients are rescaled to the LES-scale and used in the generalized representation to evaluate the local subgrid term. In this Part 1 paper, subgrid stress and production fields from this adaptive scale-similar closure are seen to be nearly indistinguishable from corresponding true fields, and to be far more accurate than corresponding results from traditional subgrid closures. Even when implemented in a low-dissipation pseudo-spectral code, this new approach to subgrid closure is stable with only minor added dissipation, and with only slightly more dissipation shows E(k) ∼ k−5/3 scaling that extends to the smallest resolved scales. Results from a posteriori tests show greatly improved accuracy in inner-scale statistics compared to traditional closure with a prescribed subgrid model. Evaluating the subgrid stress takes only about three times longer than by traditional closure with the dynamic Smagorinsky model. For LES in which accuracy is needed across all simulated scales, including the smallest resolved scales, this slightly longer time may be acceptable, and this new closure approach can provide stable simulations while representing subgrid terms accurately across all resolved scales.
AB - We propose and demonstrate an adaptive scale-similar closure approach that can represent subgrid terms accurately and stably even at or near the smallest resolved scales of a simulation. This dynamic approach is based on scale similarity and generalized representations of subgrid terms from the complete and minimal tensor representation theory of Smith (1971). The tensor polynomial coefficients in the generalized representation are adapted to the local turbulence state by solving a local system identification problem at a test-filter scale. The resulting test-scale coefficients are rescaled to the LES-scale and used in the generalized representation to evaluate the local subgrid term. In this Part 1 paper, subgrid stress and production fields from this adaptive scale-similar closure are seen to be nearly indistinguishable from corresponding true fields, and to be far more accurate than corresponding results from traditional subgrid closures. Even when implemented in a low-dissipation pseudo-spectral code, this new approach to subgrid closure is stable with only minor added dissipation, and with only slightly more dissipation shows E(k) ∼ k−5/3 scaling that extends to the smallest resolved scales. Results from a posteriori tests show greatly improved accuracy in inner-scale statistics compared to traditional closure with a prescribed subgrid model. Evaluating the subgrid stress takes only about three times longer than by traditional closure with the dynamic Smagorinsky model. For LES in which accuracy is needed across all simulated scales, including the smallest resolved scales, this slightly longer time may be acceptable, and this new closure approach can provide stable simulations while representing subgrid terms accurately across all resolved scales.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123182788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123182788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2022-0595
DO - 10.2514/6.2022-0595
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85123182788
SN - 9781624106316
T3 - AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, AIAA SciTech Forum 2022
BT - AIAA SciTech Forum 2022
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
Y2 - 3 January 2022 through 7 January 2022
ER -