TY - JOUR
T1 - A trait-based framework for assessing the vulnerability of marine species to human impacts
AU - Butt, Nathalie
AU - Halpern, Benjamin S.
AU - O'Hara, Casey C.
AU - Allcock, A. Louise
AU - Polidoro, Beth
AU - Sherman, Samantha
AU - Byrne, Maria
AU - Birkeland, Charles
AU - Dwyer, Ross G.
AU - Frazier, Melanie
AU - Woodworth, Bradley K.
AU - Arango, Claudia P.
AU - Kingsford, Michael J.
AU - Udyawer, Vinay
AU - Hutchings, Pat
AU - Scanes, Elliot
AU - McClaren, Emily Jane
AU - Maxwell, Sara M.
AU - Diaz-Pulido, Guillermo
AU - Dugan, Emma
AU - Simmons, Blake Alexander
AU - Wenger, Amelia S.
AU - Linardich, Christi
AU - Klein, Carissa J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Ecosphere published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Marine species and ecosystems are widely affected by anthropogenic stressors, ranging from pollution and fishing to climate change. Comprehensive assessments of how species and ecosystems are impacted by anthropogenic stressors are critical for guiding conservation and management investments. Previous global risk or vulnerability assessments have focused on marine habitats, or on limited taxa or specific regions. However, information about the susceptibility of marine species across a range of taxa to different stressors everywhere is required to predict how marine biodiversity will respond to human pressures. We present a novel framework that uses life-history traits to assess species' vulnerability to a stressor, which we compare across more than 44,000 species from 12 taxonomic groups (classes). Using expert elicitation and literature review, we assessed every combination of each of 42 traits and 22 anthropogenic stressors to calculate each species' or representative species group's sensitivity and adaptive capacity to stressors, and then used these assessments to derive their overall relative vulnerability. The stressors with the greatest potential impact were related to biomass removal (e.g., fisheries), pollution, and climate change. The taxa with the highest vulnerabilities across the range of stressors were mollusks, corals, and echinoderms, while elasmobranchs had the highest vulnerability to fishing-related stressors. Traits likely to confer vulnerability to climate change stressors were related to the presence of calcium carbonate structures, and whether a species exists across the interface of marine, terrestrial, and atmospheric realms. Traits likely to confer vulnerability to pollution stressors were related to planktonic state, organism size, and respiration. Such a replicable, broadly applicable method is useful for informing ocean conservation and management decisions at a range of scales, and the framework is amenable to further testing and improvement. Our framework for assessing the vulnerability of marine species is the first critical step toward generating cumulative human impact maps based on comprehensive assessments of species, rather than habitats.
AB - Marine species and ecosystems are widely affected by anthropogenic stressors, ranging from pollution and fishing to climate change. Comprehensive assessments of how species and ecosystems are impacted by anthropogenic stressors are critical for guiding conservation and management investments. Previous global risk or vulnerability assessments have focused on marine habitats, or on limited taxa or specific regions. However, information about the susceptibility of marine species across a range of taxa to different stressors everywhere is required to predict how marine biodiversity will respond to human pressures. We present a novel framework that uses life-history traits to assess species' vulnerability to a stressor, which we compare across more than 44,000 species from 12 taxonomic groups (classes). Using expert elicitation and literature review, we assessed every combination of each of 42 traits and 22 anthropogenic stressors to calculate each species' or representative species group's sensitivity and adaptive capacity to stressors, and then used these assessments to derive their overall relative vulnerability. The stressors with the greatest potential impact were related to biomass removal (e.g., fisheries), pollution, and climate change. The taxa with the highest vulnerabilities across the range of stressors were mollusks, corals, and echinoderms, while elasmobranchs had the highest vulnerability to fishing-related stressors. Traits likely to confer vulnerability to climate change stressors were related to the presence of calcium carbonate structures, and whether a species exists across the interface of marine, terrestrial, and atmospheric realms. Traits likely to confer vulnerability to pollution stressors were related to planktonic state, organism size, and respiration. Such a replicable, broadly applicable method is useful for informing ocean conservation and management decisions at a range of scales, and the framework is amenable to further testing and improvement. Our framework for assessing the vulnerability of marine species is the first critical step toward generating cumulative human impact maps based on comprehensive assessments of species, rather than habitats.
KW - anthropogenic stressors
KW - anthropogenic threats
KW - climate change
KW - conservation decision-making
KW - fishing
KW - marine conservation planning
KW - ocean
KW - pollution
KW - trait-based vulnerability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125140077&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125140077&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ecs2.3919
DO - 10.1002/ecs2.3919
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85125140077
SN - 2150-8925
VL - 13
JO - Ecosphere
JF - Ecosphere
IS - 2
M1 - e3919
ER -