TY - JOUR
T1 - A methodological overview of network vulnerability analysis
AU - Murray, Alan T.
AU - Matisziw, Timothy C.
AU - Grubesic, Tony H.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Evaluating network infrastructures for potential vulnerabilities is an important component of strategic planning, particularly in the context of managing and mitigating service disruptions. Many methods have been proposed to facilitate such analysis, providing different interpretations of infrastructure vulnerability. The primary approaches that have been employed for network vulnerability analysis can be broadly classified as scenario-specific, strategy-specific, simulation, and mathematical modeling methodologies. Research on network vulnerability assessment has traditionally focused on one of these methodologies without consideration of the others. This article highlights the important implications of methodology for both infrastructure planning and policy development. To better understand the theoretical and practical trade-offs associated with methodology selection, this article provides a review of these categories of analysis, examining benefits and shortcomings with regard to practical planning issues and policy interpretation.
AB - Evaluating network infrastructures for potential vulnerabilities is an important component of strategic planning, particularly in the context of managing and mitigating service disruptions. Many methods have been proposed to facilitate such analysis, providing different interpretations of infrastructure vulnerability. The primary approaches that have been employed for network vulnerability analysis can be broadly classified as scenario-specific, strategy-specific, simulation, and mathematical modeling methodologies. Research on network vulnerability assessment has traditionally focused on one of these methodologies without consideration of the others. This article highlights the important implications of methodology for both infrastructure planning and policy development. To better understand the theoretical and practical trade-offs associated with methodology selection, this article provides a review of these categories of analysis, examining benefits and shortcomings with regard to practical planning issues and policy interpretation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56349137799&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56349137799&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2008.00447.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2008.00447.x
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:56349137799
SN - 0017-4815
VL - 39
SP - 573
EP - 592
JO - Growth and Change
JF - Growth and Change
IS - 4
ER -