A comprehensive analysis of the axiomatic frameworks in which Fagnano’s theorem holds

Victor Pambuccian, Horst Struve, Rolf Struve

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Proofs of Fagnano’s Theorem (FT)—which is known to hold in plane absolute geometry, a fact emphasized by P. Szász and implicit in L. Fejér’s proof—under various axiomatic assumptions constitute the subject of this paper. It starts with two reflection-geometric proofs, valid in ordered metric (Bachmann) planes with free mobility, modeled on the proofs by P. Szász and L. Fejér, followed by a proof in standard ordered Hjelmslev groups with free mobility. Two minimalist axiom systems—one for non-elliptic metric planes with some rudimentary order axioms, the other for non-elliptic metric planes in which there are motions that move lines that intersect into each other, together with more order axioms—are the result of a search for minimal assumptions ensuring the validity of FT. FT is shown to be false in Galilean geometry and, appropriately restated, holds in elliptic ordered geometry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number6
JournalJournal of Geometry
Volume116
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2025

Keywords

  • Fagnano’s theorem
  • Hjelmslev’s natural geometry
  • Non-elliptic metric planes
  • Order axioms
  • Ordered elliptic geometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geometry and Topology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comprehensive analysis of the axiomatic frameworks in which Fagnano’s theorem holds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this