Abstract
ABSTRACT: We compare cost-efficient alternatives for the full factorial 24 design, the regular 25-1 fractional factorial design, and the regular 26-1 fractional factorial design that can fit the model consisting of all the main effects as well as all the two-factor interactions. For 4 and 5 factors we examine orthogonal arrays with 12 and 20 runs, respectively. For 6 factors we consider orthogonal arrays with 24 as well as 28 runs. We consult complete catalogs of two-level orthogonal arrays to find the ones that provide the most efficient estimation of all the effects in the model. We compare these arrays with D-optimal designs found using a coordinate exchange algorithm. The D-optimal designs are always preferable to the most efficient orthogonal arrays for fitting the full model in all the factors.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 369-380 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Quality Engineering |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 1 2016 |
Keywords
- A-optimal design
- D-optimal design
- column balance
- orthogonal array
- strength 2
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of two-level designs to estimate all main effects and two-factor interactions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS